Hypersphere CosmologyAlternative to big-bang

Monday, 22 February 2021 17:04

Equation 7

Equation 7

Mach’s Principle has intrigued physicists for more than a century. It exists in a variety of formulations, most of them philosophical rather than mathematical.

Broadly stated Mach’s Principle, or the Einstein-Mach Principle, says that the inertia of any single body should depend on the mass and distribution of the whole of the rest of the universe.

Thus, the inertial mass of any body may not arise as an intrinsic property of that body but may depend on the entire universe.

In the Newtonian paradigm the inertial mass and the gravitational mass of a body always have the same ratio. Newtonian theory accepts this without explanation. In Einstein’s relativity the equivalence of inertial mass and gravitational mass becomes a central principle. The gravitational constant G represents the constant ratio between inertial and gravitational mass, but where does that come from?

In a universe whose size and density varies with time, any expression of Mach’s Principle becomes problematic, either the ratio of inertial mass to gravitational mass and hence G will vary with time, or lightspeed will vary with time, or both. We have no evidence of that having happened.

Only in a universe of constant size and constant overall density can Mach’s Principle apply and take mathematical form.

Equation 7 shows a mathematical expression of Mach’s Principle. It has no conceivable use, but it does look holistically and philosophically satisfying.

Read 5134 times Last modified on Wednesday, 24 February 2021 21:36
More in this category: « Equation 8 Equation 6 »
  • HyperSphere Cosmology +

                            Hypersphere Cosmology. (6)    P J Carroll 28/2/2021   Abstract. Read More
  • Type 1A supernovae and Hypersphere Cosmology +

    Lensing, Redshift and Distance for Type1A Supernovae. All data input from Perlmutter et all, https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/9812133.pdf The measured Apparent Magnitudes of Read More
  • Galactic Rotation Curves +

    Galactic Rotation Curves. A large discrepancy exists between the rotation curves for disc galaxies expected from a classical or relativistic Read More
  • Equation 17 +

    Equation 17 The Redshift-Distance and the Lensing equations 6 and 16 together yield a derivation for the Antipode length L Read More
  • Equation 16 +

        Equation 16 A stereographic projection can show the effect of projecting an n-sphere into an n-dimensional space. For Read More
  • Equation 15 +

    Equation 15 It may seem odd that whilst the ‘enhanced’ Planck length and Planck time set a lower limit for Read More
  • Equation 14 +

    Equation 14 The universe has an information deficit in the sense that it has only one bit of information/entropy for Read More
  • Equation 13 +

    Equation 13 The universe has an information deficit in the sense that it has only one bit of information/entropy for Read More
  • Equation 12 +

    Equation 12 The Bekenstein-Hawking conjecture arose to explain the behaviour of entropy in a black hole. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_thermodynamics#Overview It asserts that Read More
  • Equation 11 +

    Equation 11 The Dirac Large Numbers Hypothesis suggests that a huge dimensionless number, or perhaps just a few huge dimensionless Read More
  • Equation 10 +

    Equation 10 Here we show the modification to Newtonian Dynamics expected in a positively curved spacetime that has a negative Read More
  • Equation 9 +

    Equation 9 Galaxies rotate but they do not rotate in accordance with our standard ideas about gravity. A large discrepancy Read More
  • 1
  • 2